Facing a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) can feel overwhelming. You’re probably served with one and left wondering about your next steps. Should you file a counter restraining order or focus on defending yourself? This blog digs into both sides, offering crucial insights to help you decide the best path for your situation.
The idea of filing a counter restraining order might appeal to you if you believe it will present a full picture of the relationship to the court. The thought is that a judge, upon seeing evidence from both sides, might recognize mutual wrongdoing or dismiss both cases altogether. This approach can give the judge a chance to see that perhaps both parties partook in abusive behavior, potentially leading to a fairer outcome.
Additionally, some counties, like Los Angeles, provide resources to help initiate a restraining order. Free clinics staffed by volunteer attorneys may guide you through the paperwork, which can be beneficial if you’re unfamiliar with the legal process. However, since these services are designed for petitioners, they might not cater to respondents effectively. It’s worth remembering that while filing can give you some assistance, the volunteers may not have enough time to dig deeply into your case.
So, if you consider this route due to its potential advantages, weigh them against the drawbacks that frequently accompany such a decision.
There are significant cons to filing a counter restraining order. First, the court prefers to hear both restraining order requests on the same day. This means you’ll likely experience extensions in your case timeline, especially if the petitioner’s hearing date is sooner than yours. For someone facing temporary restrictions like housing limitations or custody challenges, additional delays only prolong these hardships.
Furthermore, a counter order can appear as retaliation. The timing might suggest you’re more interested in counteracting their claim rather than seeking protection. Judges are trained to spot this and may question your intentions, potentially harming your credibility in court.
If the evidence doesn’t strongly support your claims, pursuing a counter order can be particularly detrimental. Lacking proof or getting caught in an inconsistency during testimony can lead not only to losing your claim but also weakening your defense against the original order. Judges make decisions based on credibility, so being perceived as untrustworthy can be a game-changer in the worst way.
Defending against a DVRO, rather than filing a counter order, is often a more strategic approach. With the right preparation and understanding of legal procedures, you can effectively present your case. Focus on gathering evidence and developing a strong narrative to disprove the allegations made against you.
Consider these actionable tips when preparing for your hearing:
There’s a resource that provides comprehensive guidance through this process—the DEFEAT the DVRO Course. It offers a framework for respondents to navigate their hearings with confidence. With lessons on presenting evidence, tackling inconsistencies, and more, it’s a vital tool for reclaiming control of your legal battle. More importantly, there’s a free introductory class available to help you get started on the right foot.
Navigating a DVRO can be complex, but by making informed decisions and being thoroughly prepared, you can effectively defend your rights and future. Remember, it’s about making the best strategic choices to represent your truth and safeguard your life.
Facing a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) can be a daunting experience. It can lead…
Facing a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) can be an overwhelming experience. It's a situation…